Cat City · Colony Mesh · any city · a proposal for any city with cats, rats and rooftops Prepared by Artificial Mind Hive, California · Sept 2026
Cat City › Studies
Studies · New York · San Francisco · Miami-Dade · Chicago

What cities spend on strays, rats and pigeons, what it buys, and what a real end costs.

Two studies with the cities' own numbers: the big cities (NYC, SF) and the problem cities (Miami-Dade's 500,000 strays; Chicago's decade as the rat capital). Then our cost, our price, and why a tracked program finishes where a shelter line never does.

Three screens: the city-spend comparison chart, the hard-questions rules card, and the sensor-data products
What is on this page and the two next to it: the spend comparison, the rules we work by, and the data the same collars collect. Concept render.
Study A · Big cities · New York and San Francisco

What the two richest cities in the country spend on strays, rats and pigeons, and what they get.

Both cities run open-door municipal shelters, both spend eight or nine figures, and in both the cat problem is flat: intake does not fall year over year because nothing they fund changes the outdoor population. The money buys housing, surgery and euthanasia for the cats that come in; it does not buy fewer cats.

New York City

New York: what one year costs · blue = every year, yellow = one-time capital, orange = us
New York: what one year costs ACC shelter contract, average per year: $53.7MACC shelter contract, average per year$53.7M ACC city funding FY2025: $37.0MACC city funding FY2025$37.0M Queens shelter (one-time, 2024): $75.0MQueens shelter (one-time, 2024)$75.0M Bronx shelter (one-time, 2026): $92.0MBronx shelter (one-time, 2026)$92.0M Rat reduction plan (2017, one-time): $32.0MRat reduction plan (2017, one-time)$32.0M Harlem rat mitigation zone (FY23): $3.5MHarlem rat mitigation zone (FY23)$3.5M Animal Population Control Program / yr: $0.3MAnimal Population Control Program / yr$0.3M Cat City per-city program / yr: $0.4MCat City per-city program / yr$0.4M
Table view
ItemValue
ACC shelter contract, average per year$53.7M
ACC city funding FY2025$37.0M
Queens shelter (one-time, 2024)$75.0M
Bronx shelter (one-time, 2026)$92.0M
Rat reduction plan (2017, one-time)$32.0M
Harlem rat mitigation zone (FY23)$3.5M
Animal Population Control Program / yr$0.3M
Cat City per-city program / yr$0.4M

The 34-year ACC contract is capped at about $1.9 billion, which the Comptroller works out to $53.7 million a year on average, before the $75M Queens and $92M Bronx buildings [1] [2] [3] [4]. Over FY2023-25 the shelters took in 28,168 cats (74 % more cats than dogs) and 16,040 of them were strays; in calendar 2024 ACC euthanized 1,315 cats [1] [5]. The city's own sterilization program is $316,000 a year; the ASPCA contract delivered 6,733 surgeries against a 10,660 target (a 37 % shortfall) at $125 each, while 2,381 private rescuers paid ~$2.9M of their own money for 24,211 TNR surgeries in the same three years [1]. Rats got a $32M plan in 2017, a $3.5M Harlem zone and a $155,000-a-year rat czar in 2023 [6] [7].

New York cats, FY2023-2025 (three years)
New York cats, FY2023-2025 (three years) Cats entering ACC shelters: 28,168Cats entering ACC shelters28,168 of which strays: 16,040of which strays16,040 Private-rescuer TNR surgeries: 24,211Private-rescuer TNR surgeries24,211 ASPCA contract surgeries (target 10,660): 6,733ASPCA contract surgeries (target 10,660)6,733 Cats euthanized, calendar 2024 alone: 1,315Cats euthanized, calendar 2024 alone1,315
Table view
ItemValue
Cats entering ACC shelters28,168
of which strays16,040
Private-rescuer TNR surgeries24,211
ASPCA contract surgeries (target 10,660)6,733
Cats euthanized, calendar 2024 alone1,315

Ten-year picture (est.): at the contract average, NYC spends roughly $540M on shelter operations per decade plus $167M of new buildings, and its stray-cat intake is still ~5,300 a year. The volunteers doing the actual population work are unfunded.

San Francisco

San Francisco: what one year costs · HSH shown because the same mesh carries the free text network on the next page
San Francisco: what one year costs Animal Care & Control budget / yr: $11.0MAnimal Care & Control budget / yr$11.0M New shelter at 1419 Bryant (one-time, 2021): $76.4MNew shelter at 1419 Bryant (one-time, 2021)$76.4M Homelessness & Supportive Housing / yr: $786MHomelessness & Supportive Housing / yr$786M Cat City per-city program / yr: $0.4MCat City per-city program / yr$0.4M
Table view
ItemValue
Animal Care & Control budget / yr$11.0M
New shelter at 1419 Bryant (one-time, 2021)$76.4M
Homelessness & Supportive Housing / yr$786M
Cat City per-city program / yr$0.4M

SF Animal Care & Control runs on about $11 million a year [9] out of a $76.4M building [10]. Its own Q4-2024 report shows 1,960 animals in one quarter: 554 cats, of which 306 were strays; 73 cats euthanized; 111 fostered; officers answered 2,774 emergency calls in 90 days [11]. Annualized that is roughly 8,000 animals, ~2,200 cats and ~1,200 stray cats a year, at ~$1,400 of budget per animal handled.

San Francisco ACC, one quarter (Oct-Dec 2024)
San Francisco ACC, one quarter (Oct-Dec 2024) Animals taken in: 1,960Animals taken in1,960 Cats taken in: 554Cats taken in554 Stray cats: 306Stray cats306 Cats euthanized: 73Cats euthanized73 Emergency calls answered: 2,774Emergency calls answered2,774
Table view
ItemValue
Animals taken in1,960
Cats taken in554
Stray cats306
Cats euthanized73
Emergency calls answered2,774

Ten-year picture (est.): about $110M of operations plus the $76M building. The stray-cat line does not move because nobody is paid to work the streets; the shelter is paid to receive.

What both cities are missing

Neither city can answer three questions a council member would ask: how many outdoor cats are there, where are they, and is the number going down? Miami-Dade at least publishes a stray estimate (500,000) and counts TNVR surgeries. NYC and SF count what walks in the door. Cat City's whole product is those three answers, measured, on a map, every month, for less than one percent of the shelter line.

Study B · Problem cities · Miami-Dade and the rat capitals

Where the problem is loudest: 500,000 stray cats in Miami, and the cities that have spent a decade losing to rats.

Miami-Dade County

Miami-Dade Animal Services budget, $ millions · +37 % in three years
Miami-Dade Animal Services budget, $ millions $0.0M $11.4M $22.8M $34.2M $45.7M FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 Total budget FY20-21: $28.9M Total budget FY21-22: $30.6M Total budget FY22-23: $34.8M Total budget FY23-24: $39.7M Total budget
Table view
SeriesFY20-21FY21-22FY22-23FY23-24
Total budget$28.9M$30.6M$34.8M$39.7M
Miami-Dade TNVR (trap-neuter-vaccinate-return) services per year · FY22-23 projection, FY23-24 target
Miami-Dade TNVR (trap-neuter-vaccinate-return) services per year 0 4,888 9,775 14,662 19,550 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 TNVR services FY20-21: 13,234 TNVR services FY21-22: 14,747 TNVR services FY22-23: 16,000 TNVR services FY23-24: 17,000 TNVR services
Table view
SeriesFY20-21FY21-22FY22-23FY23-24
TNVR services13,23414,74716,00017,000

Miami-Dade is the honest case: it names the number (~500,000 stray cats, "holding steady") [15], houses over 20,000 cats a year, returns more than 55 % of them through TNVR, and did 33,548 spay/neuter surgeries in FY23-24 while keeping a 90 %+ save rate for ten straight years [14] [13]. The bill went from $28.9M to $39.7M in three years (general-fund share $16.5M → $27.0M) [13]. That is what "doing it right" costs without tracking: $40M a year to hold 500,000 steady. Steady is the ceiling of untracked TNR because nobody knows which colonies are already done and which are re-breeding.

Miami-Dade: dollars per year vs. Cat City
Miami-Dade: dollars per year vs. Cat City Animal Services budget FY23-24: $39.7MAnimal Services budget FY23-24$39.7M General-fund share FY23-24: $27.0MGeneral-fund share FY23-24$27.0M Grants to outside orgs FY23-24: $1.3MGrants to outside orgs FY23-24$1.3M Cat City per-city program / yr: $0.4MCat City per-city program / yr$0.4M
Table view
ItemValue
Animal Services budget FY23-24$39.7M
General-fund share FY23-24$27.0M
Grants to outside orgs FY23-24$1.3M
Cat City per-city program / yr$0.4M

The rat capitals

Rodent-control money vs. the cats-at-work alternative
Rodent-control money vs. the cats-at-work alternative Chicago Bureau of Rodent Control, 2024: $14.8MChicago Bureau of Rodent Control, 2024$14.8M Chicago Bureau of Rodent Control, 2026: $12.5MChicago Bureau of Rodent Control, 2026$12.5M NYC rat reduction plan, 2017 (one-time): $32.0MNYC rat reduction plan, 2017 (one-time)$32.0M NYC Harlem rat mitigation zone: $3.5MNYC Harlem rat mitigation zone$3.5M Cat City per-city program / yr: $0.4MCat City per-city program / yr$0.4M
Table view
ItemValue
Chicago Bureau of Rodent Control, 2024$14.8M
Chicago Bureau of Rodent Control, 2026$12.5M
NYC rat reduction plan, 2017 (one-time)$32.0M
NYC Harlem rat mitigation zone$3.5M
Cat City per-city program / yr$0.4M

Chicago was Orkin's rattiest city ten years running (2015-2024) and only lost the title in 2025 because Los Angeles overtook it [16] [17]. Its Bureau of Rodent Control got $14.85M in 2024 and $12.5M in 2026, and the city's own audit says the current plan is "unlikely" to fix it [18] [19]. Meanwhile Tree House Humane Society's Cats at Work program has placed more than 1,000 sterilized feral cats at businesses and homes as rodent deterrents and runs a waitlist [20]. That is the whole Cat City rodent thesis, already proven in the rattiest city in America, just without tracking, without a map, and without the city paying for it.

Ten years of Chicago rodent budgets at today's rate is roughly $130-150M (est.) for a problem that got worse every year of the decade. NYC put $35.5M into two rat initiatives on top of routine sanitation and hired a czar. Both cities pay for poison, inspections and fines; neither pays for the one thing that keeps working after the contract ends: a sterilized, fed, tracked cat colony that stays.

Damage nobody budgets for

National scale of the problem (per year) · pigeon damage shown in thousands of dollars: $1.1 billion
National scale of the problem (per year) Cats entering US shelters, 2025: 3,000,000Cats entering US shelters, 20253,000,000 Shelter cats euthanized, 2025: 277,000Shelter cats euthanized, 2025277,000 Feral pigeon damage, $ (Pimentel 2005): 1,100,000Feral pigeon damage, $ (Pimentel 2005)1,100,000
Table view
ItemValue
Cats entering US shelters, 20253,000,000
Shelter cats euthanized, 2025277,000
Feral pigeon damage, $ (Pimentel 2005)1,100,000

Nationally 3.0 million cats entered shelters in 2025 and 277,000 were euthanized [22]. Free-ranging cats kill an estimated 1.3-4.0 billion birds and 6.3-22.3 billion mammals a year in the US, mostly by unowned cats [23]. Feral pigeons cost about $1.1 billion a year in building damage and cleanup [21]. None of that appears in a city budget line, which is why the shelter line looks like the whole cost. It is not.

Our cost · What we charge · Profit · Why it ends instead of continuing

A real end, not a band-aid: the program is priced to finish.

One year, one big city: their shelter line vs. our whole program
One year, one big city: their shelter line vs. our whole program NYC ACC contract average / yr: $53.7MNYC ACC contract average / yr$53.7M Miami-Dade Animal Services / yr: $39.7MMiami-Dade Animal Services / yr$39.7M Chicago rodent control / yr: $14.8MChicago rodent control / yr$14.8M SF Animal Care & Control / yr: $11.0MSF Animal Care & Control / yr$11.0M Cat City program price / yr: $0.6MCat City program price / yr$0.6M Cat City program cost / yr: $0.4MCat City program cost / yr$0.4M
Table view
ItemValue
NYC ACC contract average / yr$53.7M
Miami-Dade Animal Services / yr$39.7M
Chicago rodent control / yr$14.8M
SF Animal Care & Control / yr$11.0M
Cat City program price / yr$0.6M
Cat City program cost / yr$0.4M
Pilot · 90 days
$25,000

20 collars, 5 gateways, one neighborhood, a TNR partner, and a report the council can vote on. Our cost ≈ $3,384 in hardware and partner fees plus our own time. Priced to be a rounding error inside any shelter budget.

City program · per year
$600,000

1,000 tracked cats, 3,000 pigeon nodes, 50 gateways, the dashboard, monthly colony report. Our delivery cost ≈ $406,168 (3 field techs, 1 assembler, half a city lead, hardware, partner fees, and a ~4,000 sq ft warehouse to hold and train the working cats, house the loft and the bench). If the city provides an unused building in-kind, the price drops to $520,000. Big cities own empty buildings; we do not need a fancy one → 32 % gross margin, which pays the engineering/ops core from the fifth city on.

Per animal · per year
$102

That is the fully loaded delivery cost per tracked animal, warehouse included. SF's shelter line works out to ~$1,400 per animal handled; Miami-Dade's to ~$1,400 per cat and dog; NYC's ACC contract to ~$3,600 per intake. We are not competing with the shelter. We are the thing that makes it smaller.

The base. We run from a cheap Central Valley hub (Modesto or Fresno: ~$3,500/month for 4,000 sq ft, vs ~$7,000 in the Bay) and cover ground with vans. A city that wants the hub inside its limits can foot that bill, or part of it, with a building it already owns. Done right, the warehouse is also the clinic: a supervising DVM with final-year vet students logging their surgical hours neuters on site, and every animal leaves with the basics (rabies and FVRCP shots, flea and worm treatment, ear-tip, microchip) instead of being trucked to a clinic day. See the Clinic page for the staffing and the rules.

Why it ends

Targeted, measured TNR is the only intervention with a published end-state: in the Alachua County study, high-intensity TNR plus adoption in one target area cut shelter cat intake 66 % and euthanasia 95 % in two years [24]. Cities like Miami already do the surgeries; what they cannot do is target, because they cannot see the colonies. A tracked colony tells you when it is done. A done colony is a line item that disappears. Untracked TNR plateaus (Miami's own words: "holding steady"); tracked TNR converges.

Investment framing for a council: a 5-year Cat City contract at $0.60M/yr is $3.0M. Against a $40M/yr animal-services line, a 10 % sustained reduction in cat intake pays for it; the Alachua result was 66 % in the treated area. The contract is written to shrink: year 4-5 are maintenance (gateways, retagging, the map), because the population work is finished.

The network ladder · pigeons → cats → pets → people → the city

The animals are how the mesh gets built. What runs on it afterward is the bigger business.

Tagged city pigeons on a rooftop ledge
Rung 1: the rooftop layer. Concept render.
1 · Pigeons
Rooftop layer. Cheapest node ($15, solar, no GPS), highest density, lives where the gateways are. 3,000 per city = a self-healing relay blanket over every block. Tagged by the same workforce (below). No cell tower can be switched off on a pigeon.
2 · Cats
Street layer. The tracked TNR colonies. Each collar hears every other node it passes. This is the layer the city pays for, because it is the one that ends the stray problem.
3 · Owned pets
Paying customers. Petfindr collars ($49-79 retail, est.) for dogs and indoor-outdoor cats. Every sale adds a node and a family that now finds a lost pet in minutes instead of days. One in three households; this is the consumer revenue that outlives any grant.
4 · People
Free text network. A $15 pocket node on a lanyard plus the Meshtastic app on any phone (the city's own Lifeline phones qualify [25]) gives an unhoused person text messaging with no plan, no SIM, no cell coverage: to case workers, clinics, shelters, court reminders, doctor and social-services appointments, and each other. SF spends $785.6M a year on homelessness [12]; NYC DHS is $4.4B [8]. A 2,000-node city text network is about $30,000 of hardware on gateways that already exist.
5 · Services
Government programs on the mesh. Appointment reminders, benefit-renewal alerts, shelter-bed availability, outreach check-ins, an SOS button that reaches the nearest outreach worker: all text, all on the same $0/month channel. Pet food and basic vet care for unhoused and low-income pet owners ride the same care program: the warehouse clinic and the caretakers already have the food, the shots and the schedule. Delivery is best-effort and slow (seconds to minutes), so it complements Lifeline phones, it does not replace them.
6 · The city itself
Sensing and outage-proof messaging. Temperature, air, flood and noise at 4,000 street-level points; rat-activity and bin sensors; a messaging layer that still works during a power or cell outage. This is where the data contracts live.
Street, roof and sky layers of the mesh
Rungs 1-2 and 6 in one picture: cats on the street, pigeons and gateways on the roofs, a drone repeater on demand.

Who maintains it: jobs and service hours

The playbook already staffs Cat City through city job programs. The v2 addition: people who show up and do well in the community meetings and the pilot get first call on the paid roles (tagging, gateway install, cable runs, battery swaps, data entry), and court-ordered community-service hours can be served on infrastructure upkeep and pigeon tagging under a supervised partner. A city that already administers service hours gets a workforce that maintains the network; the network gets people who know the blocks. Rule: no animal handling without the partner's trained lead present.

Voice over the mesh: send the words, not the sound

LoRa moves 1-20 kbit/s, so we never send audio. We send a binary-encoded description of the speech (text plus a few bytes of tone/pace tags, ~1 byte per character) and a small device on the far end, a phone, a $15 node with a speaker, or a PC, speaks it with AI text-to-speech. Today that is a generic voice; a stored voice profile makes it your voice later (a one-time enrolment, a few KB, cached on the receiving device, nothing per message). A 20-word message is ~150 bytes: one LoRa packet, delivered in seconds, spoken instantly. Real audio clips (Codec2, ~700 bytes per 5 s) stay point-to-point and off the shared channel.

Nothing is lost when the link drops. Every message is chunked with sequence numbers; the receiver acknowledges what it has and asks only for the missing chunks; if the sender walks out of range, both sides hold the pieces and resume when a node is back in range, or when a passing cat or pigeon carries the chunks across (delay-tolerant store-and-forward). Play-when-complete is the default; a partial message is never spoken half-way.

Is this internet? No. LoRa is a messaging layer: text, positions, sensor readings, the voice descriptions above. Internet needs Wi-Fi, cellular or satellite. The two combine: a gateway with Wi-Fi or a Starlink dish bridges the mesh to the internet (Meshtastic already does this over MQTT), so one connected roof can serve a whole district's text traffic. That is the model for cities where cell service is expensive or absent, in Africa and anywhere else: residents and small businesses host the $15-$60 nodes and gateways, a local operator runs the map and the message service, and the animals carry the mesh into the blocks no one wired. Text and alerts for the price of a battery, not a phone plan.

The pigeon science (why the tags carry a compass)

Pigeons navigate with a sun compass, a magnetic sense and smell; the magnetic part is still not fully understood. A 6-gram pigeon tag can carry a 3-axis magnetometer and an IMU for about a dollar. Thousands of tagged city pigeons logging heading, magnetic field and turns, for years, is a dataset no lab has. We will not "use" magnetism as a radio (it is not one), but we can publish the first city-scale map of how they actually route, which is the kind of open science that gets a university to co-sign the permits.

Sources

  1. NYC Comptroller, Review of the City's Animal Population Control Efforts (2025)
  2. NYC Council Committee on Health, ACC budget hearing, 24 Mar 2025
  3. CBS New York: new $75 million Queens shelter (2024)
  4. NYC DDC: $92 million Bronx animal care center (2023)
  5. The Scoop: ACC euthanized 1,315 cats and 1,644 dogs in 2024
  6. NYC Mayor's Office: $32 million Neighborhood Rat Reduction Plan (2017)
  7. NYC Mayor's Office: rat czar + $3.5M Harlem Rat Mitigation Zone (2023)
  8. NYC Council DHS budget overview FY2025: $4.4B
  9. SF Chronicle (June 2025): SF Animal Care & Control annual budget $11 million
  10. SF Public Works: $76.4M new SF ACC shelter (2021)
  11. SF ACC Quarterly Report Oct-Dec 2024 (kennel intake/outcome statistics)
  12. SF.gov: HSH adopted budget FY2025-26 $785.6M
  13. Miami-Dade FY2023-24 Adopted Budget, Animal Services (operating financial summary + measures)
  14. Miami-Dade Animal Services Business Plan FY2025-26
  15. Friends of Miami Animals: county estimates ~500,000 stray cats
  16. ABC7 Chicago: Orkin rattiest city 10th straight year (2024)
  17. NBC Chicago: LA overtakes Chicago as rattiest city (Oct 2025)
  18. Block Club Chicago: $14.85M Bureau of Rodent Control, 2024 budget
  19. The Center Square: Chicago's $12.5M rat control 'unlikely' to work (2026 budget, audit)
  20. Al Jazeera: Tree House 'Cats at Work' has placed 1,000+ feral cats against rats (2021)
  21. Pimentel et al. (2005) via ScienceDirect: feral pigeon losses ≈ $1.1B/yr in the US
  22. ASPCA U.S. shelter statistics (2025 data): 3.0M cats entered shelters; 277,000 euthanized
  23. Loss, Will & Marra, Nature Communications (2013): free-ranging cats kill 1.3-4.0 billion birds and 6.3-22.3 billion mammals/yr in the US
  24. Levy, Isaza & Scott, The Veterinary Journal (2014): targeted TNR + adoption cut shelter cat intake 66% and euthanasia 95% in the target area over 2 years
  25. FCC Lifeline: free phone / up to $9.25 per month for qualifying low-income people
  26. Seeed XIAO ESP32S3 + Wio-SX1262 Meshtastic kit, $10.90
  27. Cat City / PigeyFlok labor model (this project, 2026-09-13)

Budget figures are the cities' own published numbers for the years stated. "Ten-year" totals are our arithmetic on those rates and are marked est. Cat City costs come from the labor model in the Budget page; prices are our proposal, not a contract.